Government should
find another way of decongesting Metro Manila’s major thoroughfare instead of
aggravating the inconveniences of hundreds of thousands of provincial
bus commuters, research group IBON said.
Commuters’
welfare should be the primary consideration of the Duterte administration in
addressing transport woes but its approach should be comprehensive and
regulation should cover private vehicles as well, said the group.
During a hearing conducted by the Senate Committee on Public
Services, IBON supported calls to scrap the Metro Manila Development Authority
(MMDA)’s Regulation Number 19-002, which aims to remove all provincial public
utility bus (PUB) terminals from the entire length of EDSA in order to ease
traffic.
That provincial
buses are instead directed to load and unload in integrated terminals in Sta.
Rosa, Laguna for PUBs coming from the south, in Paranaque for those with
terminals in Pasay City, and in Valenzuela City for those coming from the
north, is inconsiderate of hundreds of thousands of commuters who have to take
the provincial bus regularly, the group said.
IBON said that the MMDA regulation nitpicks on provincial buses
servicing a big number of commuters without addressing the fact that private
cars make up most of daily EDSA traffic and pollution.
Based on MMDA and
commuter network Move Metro Manila/ Komyut figures, IBON estimates that
provincial buses move up to 425,000 commuters, while cars plying EDSA move at
least 370,000.
Cars, however,
comprise 65% of traffic and also contribute more to pollution and carbon
dioxide emissions, noted the group.
Buses, meanwhile,
66% of which are provincial, take up only 3.5 percent.
Metro Manila’s transport system lacking a last-mile system makes
relocating provincial bus terminals to limited spots more difficult for
provincial bus commuters, IBON added.
Memo 19-002 adds
another layer instead of simplifying the transportation process for commuters.
It not only
aggravates their plight in combating traffic but even adds cost due to
additional rides for example.
IBON said that in
other countries, last-mile solutions include publicly available shuttle rides
or bicycle infrastructure that ensure seamless mobility from a central hub or
terminal to a passenger’s final destination.
IBON said that the bus ban also disregards how many ordinary
passengers live in neighboring provinces but work in the National Capital
Region (NCR) for lack of job opportunities elsewhere.
Taking the train
is no viable alternative because the country’s rail systems and interlinkage
remain quite underdeveloped to say the least, said the group.
The public
Philippine National Railways has not been restored to its full potential and
only runs from Tondo to Laguna; the other public Light Rail Transit (LRT)
systems operate only within Metro Manila.
The private Metro
Rail Transit 3, meanwhile, traverses EDSA but only partially, and has a record
of multiple breakdowns and mishaps due to inefficient management regardless of
fare hikes.
Looming public utility jeep (PUJ) phaseout worsens the scenario
and not only for provincial bus commuters, said IBON.
This is because
PUJs currently play a proxy role in first mile and last mile functions, or in
taking commuters to and from areas near central transport hubs.
IBON said that traffic solutions that are arbitrary and inimical
to the public such as the bus ban should be rescinded. Instead, government
should forge a pro-people solution to traffic woes that can start with
conducting genuine consultations with affected sectors for all mass transport
endeavors.
The group added
that congestion due to too many private cars can be checked, such as with a
congestion tax, stricter street parking rules, and perhaps even curbing car
ownership.
It may also be necessary, IBON said, to
conduct an audit of road and rail safety including the accountability of
corporations and agencies involved.
As with other
public services, privatization and the user-fees policy should be stopped in
mass transport, said the group.
In its transport policy study titled “Mass Transport System in
Metro Manila and the Quest for Sustainability”, IBON said that government’s
direction should be to craft a sustainable mass transport system: It should be
efficient – meaning shortest travel time, shortest possible distance, and least
changes in transport mode. It should be reliable, where expected travel time is
actual travel time, and unnecessary waiting is minimized. It should be
accessible – meaning infrastructure is easy to access, and affordable as well
as considerate of the specific needs of various sectors. It should be safe to
prevent harm and ensure pedestrian-friendly conditions. It must also be
environmentally sound using clean and energy-efficient fuels and promoting
non-motorized transport such as cycling and walking. #